Holography is considered as one of the most remarkable discoveries in modern times. Nevertheless for its first decades it seems to be getting forgotten.

Originally stepped up back at the end of the 1940s to improve electron microscopy, it can not fulfill this function and the wish of its discoverer hungarian-british physicist Dennis Gábor. Due to sources of pure coherent light, which are indispensable for optical holography, being not yet available, not even Gábor himself can locate a field of application for this phenomenon. He can neither recognize at that point of time the meaning and the potential of his discovery and with it the influence this new medium would have on our daily lives one day. Nor can he imagine the plenty of phantasms emerging from this phenomenen. Phantasms, which seem to be mostly one step ahead of applied holography.

With the discovery of laser light at the beginning of the 1960s, for the first time ever it becomes possible to record and reconstruct a real three-dimensional image of an object. What once simply starts as a little rainbow coloured picture of a toy train, today finds its applications in a vast variety of different optical and acoustical fields.

It is as remarkable as the phenomenon of holography itself, that it could never prevail as a popular medium like movie, TV, radio, the internet, print media, etc. Especially when keeping in mind all the phantasmatic stories which emerge from this medium. A lot of dreams, hopes and promises that holography never made by itself, but some of them is trying to keep.

blog.holographie.eu accompanies my scientific work on holography, which would like to give holography an attention, that elsewhere is mostly refused to it. It is of course initially interested in based techniques and technologies of holography and how it works. Moreover it is also interested in these upcoming phantasms and their stories arising from possible abilities of holography. Especially against the backdrop of holography seems to be reaching a point, where its possibilities and abilities catch phantasms.

This blog would like to serve as a sketch book for unprotected ideas, of which some maybe become expanded, while others are not haunted any further, but wants to be told and should not be unmentioned forgotten.


please visit also www.holographie.eu

2010-05-29

Wave nature of light

Christian Huygens, Augustin Fresnel and Thomas Young are considered as the three main protagonists, who construct a theory of light between 17th and early 19th century, which is looking for help of explanation on the water. Using the example of waves on the surface of the water the nature of light is demonstrated.

"This theory does not depend on knowing what light really is, but on the assumption that it consists of transverse waves, as do water waves, and that the basic wave phenomena occur in much the same way in both cases. This simple theory of the behaviour of light is completely satisfactory for understanding all of the aspects of holography [...]"

This very simple and easy to understand analogy should serve as a paragon to explain for holography fundamental characteristics of light.

When a stone hits the surface of the water, it causes oscillations.


Fig. Propagation of water waves outgoing from a point source

The caused waves propagate in all directions - outgoing from a point source. They move up and down, vertical to the direction of propagation.

"For this reason, such waves are said to be transverse. (In contrast, sound waves in air consist of regions of compression and rarefication along the direction of travel and are called longitude waves). That water waves are transverse is shown convincingly by considering a bobber on the surface, rising and falling vertically as the traveling waves pass it."


Fig. Propagation of water waves - bird's-eye view and cross section

The left part of the figure shows circular propagation of waves from a bird's-eye view. The dotted lines indicate wave valleys, the consistent lines indicate wave crests. To pay a correct terminology back in its own coin, these circles should be named wave fronts. The right part of the figure shows a wave front in cross section as sinusoidal curve. Using the example of sinusoid some terms should be explained, which are going to be used afterwards.
The distance between two wave valleys, respectively two wave crests, describes the wavelength (in figure distance A-A', and B-B'). For a stone now hits the surface of the water exactly at the same position in exact equal intervals, a pattern of a sinusoid curve occurs (respectively a pattern of waves on the surface of the water), which remains steady. For the sinusoid is divided right in its middle by an imaginary horizontal line (dotted line in figure), the distance between the line an maximum of a wave crest, or the maximum of a wave valley, is called amplitude (not illustrated in figure). The passage from zero point to the top of a wave crest, back to zero point, to the low of a wave valley, back again to zero point describes one complete oscillation - one cycle. The frequency measures the amount of times a cycle passes a certain point in one second. It is specified in hertz (hz).

The just explained terms are valid for any kind of sinusoidal curves - anyway if sound, water or light. One significant difference between a water wave and a light wave should not remain unmentioned, to avoid any potential misunderstanding in coming entries about interference and the recording of wave fronts. While a water wave moves up and down, which means at a certain position wave crest and wave valley alternate, a light wave is a standing wave. The wave pattern - position of wave crest and wave valley - does not change.


No comments:

Post a Comment

contact